Legal Opinion
State v. Cowin
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 11, 2003No. Nos. 28492-8-II; 28609-2-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
David and Kelli Cowin appeal their convictions of manufacturing marijuana, arguing that the trial court erred in denying their motions to suppress. The State cross-appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in declining to order Kelli Cowin to pay a $1,000 fine under RCW 69.50.430(1). We affirm the convictions but remand for imposition of the mandatory fine.
Facts
On July 20, 2000, the Olympic Peninsula Narcotics Enforcement Team (OPNET) received an anonymous tip from a caller who reported that David Cowin and an associate named “Herbie” were growing marijuana at *754Cowin’s residence at 862…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. TheinWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. TheinWashington Supreme Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. CowinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. CowinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. CowinWashington Supreme Court · 2003