Legal Opinion
In Re the Grand Jury Empaneled April 24, 2008
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 15, 2008No. Misc. 08-104PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER 1
LINARES, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is an appeal by a law firm (the “Law Firm”) of the Magistrate Judge’s decision in this grand jury matter to appoint temporary conflict counsel for the purpose of advising the Court and the witnesses as to whether or not a conflict of interest exists in the Law Firm’s representation of all four witnesses. Additionally, the Law Firm appeals the Magistrate Judge’s decision denying a stay of her initial ruling. For the reasons set forth below, both appeals are denied.
I. Factual and Procedural History 2
A. Background
On or about…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. José Mulero-Vargas [1]United States District Court · 2019