Legal Opinion

REDEVELOPMENT COM'N OF GREENSBORO v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1998No. COA97-1096PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*632HORTON, Judge.

According to Chapter 160A, Article 22 of the General Statutes, a planning commission, through a properly approved redevelopment plan, may acquire by condemnation properties located in a “blighted area” or a “rehabilitation, conservation, and reconditioning area.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 160A-503(2) and (21) (1994); and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 160A-513 (1994). A “rehabilitation, conservation, and reconditioning area” is an area in danger of becoming a “blighted area” or “nonresidential redevelopment area” in the absence of municipal action. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 160A-503(21). A “blighted area”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. REDEVELOPMENT COM'N OF CITY OF WASHINGTON v. GrimesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. City of Raleigh v. RileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moores v. Greensboro Minimum Housing Standards CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. REDEVELOPMENT COM'N OF GREENSBORO v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API