Dickman v. Williams
Mississippi Supreme Court
Error to the Circuit Court of Warren County. Hon. Geo. E. Brown, Judge. The facts of the case are sufficiently set out in the opinion of the court.
Read the full summary
Error to the Circuit Court of Warren County. Hon. Geo. E. Brown, Judge. The facts of the case are sufficiently set out in the opinion of the court. The following are the assignments of error, to wit: 1. In overruling claimant’s objection to, and admitting in evidence, the copy of the collector’s permit. 2. In refusing claimant’s second instruction. 3. In granting plaintiff’s instruction, the fifth in the record. 4. In overruling claimant’s motion for a new trial. 5. In overruling claimant’s objection to the statement of Pharr. The ouus probandi was on the plaintiff in attachment to show that…
1Opinion of the CourtSimkall, J.
This is a controversy between the attaching creditor and a. claimant of the property.
It appears that the eight bales of cotton were on board the steamer Magenta at Yicksburg, to be transported to New Orleans, under a bill of lading, to be there delivered to the consignees, Dickmán & Hill. The cotton was shipped by John W. Boyd, at Shell Mound Landing, on the steamer Countess, on account of T. B. Gr. Weisenger, with the privilege of reshipment, and under that stipulation was, at Yicksburg, transferred to the Magenta. The bill of lading was, without objection, put in evidence to the
*505The burden…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fogg v. Child & FitzhughNew York Supreme Court · 1852
- O. C. Tiffany & Co. v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by6 opinions
- Moore v. Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1881
- Bank v. Hill, Fontaine & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- Hernandez v. AaronMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
- French v. SaleMississippi Supreme Court · 1882
- Chaffe v. Mississippi & Tennessee RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.