Legal Opinion

Mandeville v. Canterbury

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 1, 1943No. 422PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent, said to be a citizen of California who claims an interest in a trust estate created under a will probated in Illinois, brought this suit in the District Court for Northern Illinois for construction of the will, joining as defendants the trustees and other interested parties, all alleged to be citizens of Illinois. The relief prayed is that the court, after construing the will, render a decree determining respondent’s rights in the trust property and directing the trustee to account and to turn over to respondent her share in the trust property. Included in the trust property are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Toucey v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Commonwealth Trust Co. of Pittsburgh v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Canterbury v. MandevilleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. PSL Realty Co. v. Granite Investment Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Callaway v. BentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Ballantine Books Inc. v. Capital Distributing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Oil & Gas Ventures-First 1958 Fund, Ltd. v. KungDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  5. Alf Key v. Mrs. Louise P. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API