Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Trust Co. of Pittsburgh v. Bradford

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 30, 1936No. 273PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

The order granting this certiorari limited our consideration “to the question of jurisdiction and its appropriate exercise.”

The facts, not in serious dispute, were fully set out by the Circuit Court of Appeals. It will suffice now to restate those bearing particularly' on the. points- for decision.

The Trust Department of The Bank of Pittsburgh National Association — The Bank — acquired real estate mortgages and held them- in a pool apart from other assets. It sold participation shares therein to sundry customers and issued appropriate certificates. Interest on the mortgages, when collected,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Pennsylvania v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Markham v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Propper v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Goncalves Ex Rel. Goncalves v. Rady Children's Hospital San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API