Legal Opinion

Ain Leasing Corp. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Allan L. Winick, J.

Defendant Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. (Peat, Marwick) *903moves to reargue a decision of this court (Winick, J., Aug. 24, 1995) which granted plaintiffs motion compelling defendant to respond to plaintiff’s notice of discovery and inspection. Plaintiff has now conceded that defendant has served its objections timely to plaintiffs notice of discovery and inspection dated June 30, 1994. The court, therefore, grants reargument. Upon reargument, the court modifies its decision as follows:

Plaintiff on or about June 30, 1994, served a notice of discovery and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eagle Comtronics, Inc. v. Pico, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Technical Tape Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Delta Filter Corp. v. MorinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Technical Tape Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. Ferranti Electric, Inc. v. HarwoodNew York Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Verizon New York Inc. v. New York State Public Service CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API