Legal Opinion

City of Crawfordsville v. Irwin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, C. J.

This action was brought by Volney Q. Irwin and Tilghman J. Lehr against Robert Alexander, Benjamin Whits et, and the city of Crawfordsville. The object of the action was to recover from the defendants the value of certain brick sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendants Alexander and Whitset, and to enforce a lien against the city upon real estate. Such proceedings were-had as that judgment was rendered against the city for the debt and for the enforcement of the supposed lien. From this judgment, the city appeals, and has assigned, amongst, other alleged errors, that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barker v. BuellIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Howell v. ZerbeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Munger v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Eel River Draining Ass'n v. ToppIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Cochran v. UttIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Crawfordsville v. BrundageIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Adams v. LeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. City of Crawfordsville v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. City of Crawfordsville v. BarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Peck v. SimsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API