Legal Opinion

Spyres v. Pruco Life Ins. Co.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 14, 2021No. 2:21-cv-01147Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 JADA SPYRES, No. 2:21-cv-01147-WBS-AC 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO REMAND 15 PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; EDUARDO ZEITER; and DOES 1 16 through 10, 17 Defendants. 18 19 ----oo0oo---- 20 Plaintiff Jada Spyres (“plaintiff”) brought this action 21 against defendants Pruco Life Insurance Company (“Pruco”) and 22 Eduardo Zeiter because Pruco refused to pay plaintiff the $1 23 million death benefit from a life insurance policy insuring her 24 partner Zachary Ortiz…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Morris v. Princess Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Plute v. Roadway Package System, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2001
  5. MacEy v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API