State v. Mills
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1DissentBrock, C.J.
The criteria for determining whether a witness is competent are: (1) the ability to observe, remember, and narrate; and (2) an understanding of the duty to tell the truth. N.H. R. Ev. 601(b); State v. Keyes, 114 N.H. 487, 490, 322 A.2d 615, 617 (1974). The trial court has great discretion in the manner in which the determination of competency is made, see, e.g., State v. Blum, 132 N.H. 396, 399, 566 A.2d 1131, 1132-33 (1989), but in deciding whether the witness is competent, it must consider the above criteria. In my opinion, the trial court failed to adequately question the youth on his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. SimondsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- State v. JudkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- State v. KeyesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- State v. BlumSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- State v. BairdSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.