Legal Opinion

State v. Odubanjo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1992No. 60320PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matia, Chief Justice.

Defendant-appellant appeals from convictions on drug counts and violence specifications rendered by the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas. Appellant appeals his guilty pleas arguing that he did not make knowing, intelligent and voluntary pleas. On review, we find error and reverse the judgment of the trial court pertaining to sentencing and remand for resentencing.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

Defendant-appellant, Suleman Odubanjo, entered a plea-bargain agreement with the state to several drug counts, enumerated below. Prior to appellant’s guilty pleas, the prosecutor and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Tuan Quoc NguyenHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. WeberOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. Garcia, 08ap-224 (12-9-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. Qualls, Unpublished Decision (3-4-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. State v. TabbaaOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API