Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Tabbaa

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 2003No. 81410Published

1DissentKarpinski, Judge

{¶ 44} I respectfully dissent regarding Tabbaa’s motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to R.C. 2943.031.

{¶ 45} The case law is quite settled that the trial court has no discretion regarding whether to grant a motion to withdraw a guilty plea if the statutory conditions are met. State v. Yuen, Franklin App. No. 01AP-1410, 2002-Ohio-5083, 2002 WL 31124023; State v. Mason (Feb. 15, 2002), Greene App. No. 2001-CA-113, 2002 WL 242662; State v. Weber (1997), 125 Ohio App.3d 120, 707 N.E.2d 1178. “[A]s evidenced by the use of the mandatory term ‘shall,’ the trial court has no discretion and must set…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Galvan v. PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Wachendorf v. ShaverOhio Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API