State v. Tabbaa
Ohio Court of Appeals
1DissentKarpinski, Judge
{¶ 44} I respectfully dissent regarding Tabbaa’s motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to R.C. 2943.031.
{¶ 45} The case law is quite settled that the trial court has no discretion regarding whether to grant a motion to withdraw a guilty plea if the statutory conditions are met. State v. Yuen, Franklin App. No. 01AP-1410, 2002-Ohio-5083, 2002 WL 31124023; State v. Mason (Feb. 15, 2002), Greene App. No. 2001-CA-113, 2002 WL 242662; State v. Weber (1997), 125 Ohio App.3d 120, 707 N.E.2d 1178. “[A]s evidenced by the use of the mandatory term ‘shall,’ the trial court has no discretion and must set…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Galvan v. PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Wachendorf v. ShaverOhio Supreme Court · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.