Legal Opinion

J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Campbell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1887PublishedCited by 18 opinions

TJnion County. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtThayek, J.

The respondent commenced an action in the court below against the appellant, to recover damages. The complaint is as follows:

“ That plaintiff is a private corporation, duly and regularly incorporated under and by virtue of the general laws of the state of Wisconsin, with power to sue and be sued, to plead and be impleaded, and doing business at the city of Portland, in the state of Oregon, as such corporation.

2d. That heretofore, to wit, on the 10th day of September, 1884, one A. C. Newman made, executed and delivered to plaintiff his certain chattel mortgage in writing, bearing date that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chapman v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Webb v. NickersonOregon Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Knowles v. HerbertOregon Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Swank v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Cone v. IvinsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Kitchen v. SchusterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Mayes v. StephensOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Reinstein v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API