Legal Opinion
Schroeder v. Boeing Commercial Airplane Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 5, 1989No. Civ. A. 87-1220PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHEN, Senior District Judge:
The defendant, Boeing Commercial Airline Co. (“Boeing”), has filed several in limine motions to allow us to clarify various aspects of the case before this action proceeds to trial. We limit this discussion to the resolution of whether we should exclude all evidence pertaining to plaintiff Warren Schroeder’s per quod claim at trial. While there is little difference in the end result, we believe this motion is more properly approached as a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Since…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Elden v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Stager v. SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Sawyer v. BaileySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Butcher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. Bell Sports, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1996
- Friedman v. KlazmerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Dunphy v. GregorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Dunphy v. GregorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Martin v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.