Legal Opinion

Jarkieh v. Badagliacco

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1945No. Civ. 12756Published

1Opinion of the Court

68 Cal.App.2d 426 (1945)

ALBERT E. JARKIEH, Respondent,

v.

EMMA BADAGLIACCO, Appellant.

Civ. No. 12756.

California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. One.

Mar. 16, 1945.

Emmett R. Burns, James M. Thomas and James A. Himmel for Appellant.

O'Connor, Neubarth & Moran and Harold H. Cohn for Respondent.

PETERS, P. J.

There are pending before this court several appeals and motions, all connected with plaintiff's attempts to secure a dismissal of the appeal of defendant, or with defendant's attempts to secure relief from her default in failing to have the record prepared within the time prescribed by law.

Plai…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Beard v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Smith v. JaccardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Averill v. LincolnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Helbush v. HelbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Jarkieh v. BadagliaccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API