Legal Opinion
Quinones v. Landron
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 5, 1938No. 3336PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, appellees, are the two associate commissioners of the Public Service Commission of Puerto Rico, which, according to Section 38 of the Organic Act (Act of March 2, 1917, c. 145, 39 Stat. 951, 964), as amended by Act of Congress of March 4, 1927 (44 Stat. 1418, 1420, 48 U.S. C.A. § 750), consists of “a public service commissioner, who shall be the president of the said commission, and two associated commissioners”. The defendants, appellants, are the president of the Commission and a law clerk, appointed by the president without the consent of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Redlands Foothill Groves v. JacobsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
- Culp v. ScurlockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940