Legal Opinion
Laufer v. Rothschild
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 11, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for fraud in connection with the purchase of certain stock options on the American Stock Exchange, the defendants Spear, Leeds & Kellogg, Investors Company and Ron Scher appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), dated March 18, 1988, as denied those branches of their motion which were to dismiss various causes of action in the complaint insofar as they were asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision which denied those branches of the appellants’ motion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Green v. LeibowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Knibbs v. WagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- American Distilling Co. v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Pierce v. Richard Ellis & Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1970
- Goldberg v. New York TimesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rose Lee Mfg., Inc. v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Classic Appraisals Corp. v. DeSantisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Finkel v. D.H. Blair & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Federal Express Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1989
- Everything Discount, Inc. v. Graham Raflico Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994