Legal Opinion
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Federal Express Corp.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided November 28, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Louis B. York, J.
Facts
The plaintiff sues for damages for negligence and conver*802sion. Subrogor Loren Industries, Inc. (Loren) sent a package via defendant Federal Express Company (Fedco) on or about December 24, 1987. This package was received by Fedco in Hollywood, Florida, and allegedly contained 163 gold ring mountings which had a selling price of $8,143.46. This package was to be sent to Loren’s customer located in New York City by what is designated by both parties as "Priority 1” delivery, meaning that the parcel will reach its destination the following business day by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- S. J. Capelin Associates, Inc. v. Globe Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Barrett v. JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- I.C.C. Metals, Inc. v. Municipal Warehouse Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Todd Heller, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- The Nissan Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Ltd. v. Institute of London Underwriters, Third-Party-Defendant-Appellee v. Aceves Trucking Company, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party-Appellant. The Nissan Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Ltd. v. Institute of London Underwriters, Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant v. Aceves Trucking Company, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Todd Heller, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000