Legal Opinion

In Re MMD

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1995No. 94-FS-620Published

1Opinion of the Court

662 A.2d 837 (1995)

In re M.M.D. & B.H.M., Appellants.

No. 94-FS-620.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued April 4, 1995.

Decided June 30, 1995.

Nancy D. Polikoff, for appellants.

Laurie P. McManus, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Garland Pinkston, Acting Corp. Counsel at the time the brief was filed, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for the Dist. of Columbia as amicus curiae.

Michele Zavos, Elizabeth Hendrickson, Kathryn Kendell, and Shannon Minter filed an amicus curiae brief for the Nat. Center for Lesbian Rights, Gay and Lesbian Parents Coalition Intern.,…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API