Millets v. State

I would affirm. I cannot conclude that the trial court erred by denying the motion to suppress.

Officer Witt testified that it appeared that Appellant was concealing a controlled substance. In addition to observing Appellant’s furtive conduct in concealing the plastic container down his pants, Officer Witt questioned Appellant for several minutes, confronting him with what the officer had observed, while Appellant insisted that he did not know what the officer was talking about and that he did not stick anything down his pants. The officer could reasonably conclude that the totality of these…