Legal Opinion

I.T. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 16, 1993No. Nos. 92-947, 92-1075PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

We conclude that, in the totality of the surrounding circumstances, the officer’s plain view observation of a plastic baggy of a type uniquely used for narcotics sticking out of the respondent’s pocket provided probable cause for his arrest and subsequent search. P.L.R. v. State, 455 So.2d 363 (Fla.1984); Cross v. State, 560 So.2d 228 (Fla.1990); Council v. State, 442 So.2d 1072 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Hence, the motion to suppress the drugs found in the bag was properly denied and the adjudication on appeal in case number 92-1075 is therefore affirmed.

The imposition, on a separate charge, of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Council v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. F.G.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. State v. K.V.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. McNeil v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. IT v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Millets v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API