Legal Opinion

Schall v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1995No. H012780PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, J.

Plaintiff Betty Schall sued her employer, defendant Lockheed Missiles and Space Company, Inc., for sexual harassment. During in limine proceedings, the trial court ruled plaintiff incompetent to testify about the harassment because her only memory of the behavior occurred after she had been hypnotized by her therapist. Plaintiff then conceded that she had no evidence of the harassment other than her testimony. The trial court therefore ordered a nonsuit. Plaintiff appeals, and we affirm the judgment.

Scope of Review

Plaintiff’s briefs betray a fundamental misunderstanding about…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ajaxo Inc. v. E Trade Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Wilson v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. United States v. CordobaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
  4. People v. CheekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Wilson v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API