Legal Opinion
Tuan H. Nguyen v. Austin Quality Foods, Inc.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided September 24, 2013No. 5:12-CV-00049-FLPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment (DE 21). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), United States Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. entered a memorandum and recommendation (“M & R”) wherein it is recommended that the court grant defendants’ motion. Plaintiff filed objections to the M & R, to which defendants responded. In this posture, the issues raised are ripe for ruling. For the reasons that follow, the court grants defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
STATEMENT OF…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Driskell v. Summit Contracting Grp., Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2018
- Hopkins v. Mwr Mgmt. Co.North Carolina Business Court · 2017
- Davis v. Capital Ready Mix Concrete, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2023
- Earls v. Forga Contracting, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020
- Ferrell v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.