Legal Opinion

Grand Rapids & I. R. v. Blanchard

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1930No. 5261PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILLITS, District Judge.

This action was begun June 5, 1909, against the first nineteen persons named as appellees, to restrain the proving up- of homestead entries, made by them respectively, upon tracts of land aggregating 2,861.44 acres in Michigan. Pending the aetion the several entrants made their proofs and the lands were patented by the government according to their respective entries. The cause was before the court below on the original bill, a supplement thereto, filed in 1913, setting up the granting of the patents referred to-, praying for cancellation thereof, and a second…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. United States v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. United States v. Colton Marble & Lime Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. United States v. Grand Rapids & I. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cold Metal Process Co. v. E. W. Bliss Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  2. United States v. EgelakDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1959
  3. Eaton v. GrubbsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1963
  4. Cold Metal Process Company and the Union National Bank of Youngstown, Ohio, Trustee v. E. W. Bliss Company, E. W. Bliss Company v. Cold Metal Process Company and the Union National Bank of Youngstown, Ohio, Trustee, Union National Bank of Youngstown, Ohio, Trustee v. Greer Steel Company, Union National Bank of Youngstown, Ohio, Trustee v. E. W. Bliss CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API