Legal Opinion
Drnek v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 26, 2002No. 01 C 0840, 01 C 2586PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in these cases are Chicago Police and Fire Department officers who were involuntarily retired under the City of Chicago’s mandatory retirement ordinance, Chicago Municipal Code § 2-152-140. Donald Drnek sued the City of Chicago (“City”) for violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (“ADEA”), and for due process violations under federal and Illinois law. James Minch, Richard Graf and Richard Cosentino filed a substantially identical claim on behalf of themselves and others similarly…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. BettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- James D. Minch and Richard A. Graf v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Badgley v. WaltonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Correa-Ruiz v. FortunoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Ironforge. Com v. Paychex, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Drnek v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.