Legal Opinion

Flood v. Katz

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2006No. 31957PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Chief Justice.

This ease involves an effort to set aside a satisfaction of judgment and order of dismissal entered following a mediated settlement of a judgment.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Robert A. Flood and other plaintiffs (collectively “Flood”) filed a securities fraud suit against Irwin A. Katz (“Katz”), a current Texas resident, and co-defendants in district court in March 1994. The district judge entered judgment in favor of Flood in December 2002 ordering the defendants to pay $1,158,943 plus interest. Katz appealed the judgment. While the appeal was pending Flood…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Compton v. ComptonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Great Plains Equipment, Inc. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Zimmerman v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Campbell v. KildewIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Magic Valley Foods, Inc. v. Sun Valley Potatoes, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Specialty Restaurants Corp. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  2. Waller v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFAREIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Idaho State Police Ex Rel. Russell v. Real Property Situated in the County of CassiaIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Secured Investment Corp v. Myers Executive Building, LLCIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Nunez v. JohnsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API