State v. Aytche
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Defendant first contends the court erred in denying his motion for a continuance based on defendant’s assertion that pain interfered with his ability to stand trial. This assignment in effect challenges the trial court’s ruling that defendant was competent to stand trial. Defendant contends pain from a previous back injury rendered him incapable to proceed, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1001 (1988).
Prior to trial defense counsel filed a written motion for “evaluation of defendant.” In this motion, counsel requested that defendant be examined and treated for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. ColeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. RyderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.