Leach v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF MARTIN LEACH’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (2) DENYING DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
BORMAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief (Docket Entry 2). The Court held hearings on December 18-19, 2003. The Court heard the testimony of Plaintiff Martin Leach. Defendant introduced into evidence the depositions of David Thurs-field, Dennis Ross, and John Walker. In addition, both parties introduced exhibits into evidence. Thereafter, the Court heard argument by both…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Basicomputer Corp. v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Pepsico, Inc., a Corporation v. William E. Redmond, Jr., and the Quaker Oats Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lawry v. PalmColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Whirlpool Corp. v. BurnsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2006
- Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010