Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 29, 1986No. 15784-1-IPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.

The defendant James Jackson was found guilty by a jury of first degree statutory rape. He appeals the judgment and sentence, arguing that the trial court erred by excluding two defense witnesses who would have testified that Jackson had a reputation for good moral character and truthfulness. Jackson also asserts that the trial court erred by allowing two state witnesses to relate out-of-court statements by the victim. We reverse, holding that the reliability of the hearsay statements was not established.

James Jackson began living with the victim, a 5-year-old girl, and her mother in July…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ca 79-2963 Eloise Beard, as Administratrix of the Estate of Jeff Beard, Deceased v. Roy Martin MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Medical Therapy Sciences, Inc., and Stanley BermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  2. State v. LeavittWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. City of Kennewick v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. LopezWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Hendricks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API