State v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.
The defendant James Jackson was found guilty by a jury of first degree statutory rape. He appeals the judgment and sentence, arguing that the trial court erred by excluding two defense witnesses who would have testified that Jackson had a reputation for good moral character and truthfulness. Jackson also asserts that the trial court erred by allowing two state witnesses to relate out-of-court statements by the victim. We reverse, holding that the reliability of the hearsay statements was not established.
James Jackson began living with the victim, a 5-year-old girl, and her mother in July…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Ca 79-2963 Eloise Beard, as Administratrix of the Estate of Jeff Beard, Deceased v. Roy Martin MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Medical Therapy Sciences, Inc., and Stanley BermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- State v. LeavittWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Kennewick v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. LopezWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Hendricks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.