Legal Opinion

Bussiere v. Roberge

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 21, 1998No. 97-108PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, j.

The defendants, A. Roland Roberge, Carolyn Roberge, HT Management Corporation, and Fifty Five Associates, Ltd. (Fifty Five), appeal an order of the Superior Court (Sullivan, J.) holding, inter alia, that plaintiff Emile Bussiere (the plaintiff) had the right to exclusive possession and control, as against defendant Fifty Five, of an apartment in Manchester. We affirm.

The order appealed from concluded the first phase of a bifurcated trial. It was represented at trial that plaintiff Wayne Theodore would not participate in the first phase of this case. Therefore, in this opinion we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blevens v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961
  2. C & M Realty Trust v. WiedenkellerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  3. Dearborn v. Town of MilfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. Cole v. Lake Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1874
  5. Lemm Development Corp. v. Town of BartlettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Feld's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. 74 Cox Street, LLC v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Pope v. LeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  4. Doyle v. Town of GilmantonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  5. Feld's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API