Legal Opinion
Wong Gong Fay v. Herbert W. Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 20, 1955No. 13970PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant brought an action in the District Court of the Northern District of California, Southern Division, seeking a judgment declaring him to be a national of the United States.
After trial duly had the District Court denied Appellant the relief prayed for and made a finding of fact reading as follows:
“That the person who calls himself Wong Gong Fay and who claims to be the son of Wong Hie has failed to introduce evidence of sufficient clarity to satisfy or convince this court that Wong Hie is the natural blood father of the person Wong Gong Fay, or that he was born at the time and place…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ly Shew, as Guardian Ad Litem of Ly Moon and Ly Sue Ning v. John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of State of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Chow Sing, by His Guardian Ad Litem, Chow Yit Quong v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., as Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wong Gong Fay v. Herbert W. Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Ng Yip Yee v. Bruce G. Barber, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization,appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Mon v. DullesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1958
- Lee Wing Get v. DullesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1957