Legal Opinion

Walter Connally & Co. v. Steger

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 24, 1928No. 3516Published

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above.)

A mortgagee out of possession when the mortgaged property is levied upon is not entitled to the remedy provided by the' trial of right of property statute referred to in the statement above, unless' at the time of the levy he has a right to immediate possession of the property. Garrity v. Thompson, 64 Tex. 597; Willis v. Satterfield, 85 Tex. 301, 20 S. W. 155; State Exch. Bank v. Smith (Tex. Civ. App.) 166 S. W. 666. It conclusively appeared appellee did not have possession of the lumber at the time it was iévied upon, and appellants insist it did not appear…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Garrity & Huey v. Thompson & OhmstedeTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. State Exchange Bank v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Rodger v. Toilettes Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API