Legal Opinion

Garrity & Huey v. Thompson & Ohmstede

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1885No. Case No. 1915PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Navarro. Tried below before the Hon. X D. Bradley. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.

The appellees sued out an execution upon a judgment obtained against J. G. Campbell, and had it levied upon a stock of goods in the possession of Campbell, and with which he was carrying on the business of a druggist. The levy also included five show-cases, four steel fountains and one drug mill, used in the above business of the defendánt in execution. Appellants filed a bond and affidavit of claim for the purpose of tidying the right of property in the show-cases, fountains and mill, but laid no claim to any of the other articles included in the levy. The basis of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Luckett v. TownsendTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Weight v. HendersonTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Erwin v. BlanksTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Belt v. RaguetTexas Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Adoue & Lobit v. H. Seeligson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Bufkor, Inc. v. Star Jewelry Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Wilber v. Gus. J. Kray & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Texas Pacific Coal Company v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  5. Amarillo Nat. Bank. v. SanbornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API