Legal Opinion

State v. Freeman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 11, 1983No. 514A82PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

I

Defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the burglary charge for insufficient evidence on the question of his intent to commit the felony of rape.

For a jury to properly convict a defendant of first degree burglary, the State must produce sufficient evidence at trial that a breaking and entering of an occupied dwelling occurred during the nighttime and that the defendant had the intent to commit a felony therein. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-51 (1981); State v. Jones, 294 N.C. 642, 243 S.E. 2d 118 (1978); State v. Garrison, 294 N.C. 270, 240…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. State v. TippettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. WorthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. VanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. ForneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API