Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Dixon
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 13, 1987No. C-2-87-896PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KINNEARY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court to consider plaintiffs’ motion to remand and defendants’ motion for leave to file an amended petition for removal.
On June 24, 1987, plaintiffs, Jack Cunningham and Jack Cunningham, Inc., filed this action in the Court of Common Pleas for Washington County, Ohio. Count Four of the complaint alleges that two of the defendants, United Steelworkers of America International AFL-CIO and USWA Local 6858, have engaged in an unlawful secondary boycott against the plaintiffs. There is no reference on the face of the complaint…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lodge 76, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Local 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Union v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hattiesburg Building & Trades Council v. BroomeSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Arthur Taylor v. General Motors Corporation, and Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brawn v. ColemanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001