Legal Opinion

Hattiesburg Building & Trades Council v. Broome

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 27, 1964No. 669PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

After finding that the primary employer was not in commerce and ruling that the pre-emption rule of San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U. S. 236, was therefore not applicable, the state court enjoined picketing at the premises of the secondary employer. The judgment must be reversed. The jurisdictional standards established by the National Labor Relations Board (see 23 N. L. R. B. Ann. Rep. 8 (1958)) may be satisfied by reference to the business operations of either the primary or the secondary employer. Truck Drivers Local No. 649, 93 N. L. R. B. 386; Teamsters Local No. 554,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Local No. 438 Construction & General Laborers' Union v. CurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1963

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Radio & Television Broadcast Technicians Local Union 1264 v. Broadcast Service of Mobile, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Hanna Mining Co. v. District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. American Radio Ass'n v. Mobile Steamship Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Prospect Dairy, Inc. v. Dellwood Dairy Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1964
  5. Russell v. Electrical Workers Local 569California Supreme Court · 1966

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API