Legal Opinion
(PS)(UD)Barragan v. Croney
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 30, 2021No. 1:21-cv-01427Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHELLE BARRAGAN, No. 1:21-cv-01427-DAD-EPG 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER SUA PONTE REMANDING CASE TO STANISLAUS COUNTY SUPERIOR 14 DAVE CRONEY, COURT AND DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT 15 Defendant. (Doc. Nos. 1, 2) 16 17 18 This is an unlawful detainer action brought under California state law by plaintiff 19 Michelle Barragan against defendant Dave Croney. On September 27, 2021, defendant removed 20 this case to this federal court from the Stanislaus County Superior Court. (Doc.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Geographic Expeditions, Inc. v. Estate of LhotkaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United Investors Life Insurance Company v. Waddell & Reed Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- California ex rel Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.