Legal Opinion

De Lao v. Califano

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 19, 1977No. Nos. 76-1365, 75-2633, 75-2987 and 76-2756PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

These are class actions against the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, challenging his termination, without a prior evidentiary hearing, of certain disability payments under the federal Supplemental Security Income program (SSI), 42 U.S.C. Ch. 7, Sub. Ch. XVI, §§ 1381ff.

I. STATUTORY AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND.

On October 30, 1972, Congress enacted the Social Security Amendments of 1972, Pub.L. 92-603, 86 Stat. 1329, which repealed three categorical assistance programs of federal grants to states for state-administered programs of assistance to poor persons,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Harry Kenneth Clark v. Library of CongressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Maryland Department of Human Resources v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  3. Beller v. MiddendorfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Terry R. Finnegan, Sr. v. David Matthews, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Doe v. United States Civil Service CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API