Legal Opinion

Lukashin v. United Collection Bureau Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 24, 2025No. 3:24-cv-05685Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 IGOR LUKASHIN, CASE NO. 3:24-cv-05685-DGE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 12 v. RECONSIDERATION (DKT. NO. 33.) 13 UNITED COLLECTION BUREAU, INC., 14 Defendant. 15 16 I INTRODUCTION 17 Plaintiff initiated this action alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 18 (“FDCPA”). Defendant moved to dismiss on the grounds that the claim is time barred. (Dkt. 19 No. 11.) This Court granted the motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 32.) Plaintiff moves for 20 reconsideration, arguing that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Rotkiske v. KlemmSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  5. Xechem, Inc., and Xechem International, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API