State v. Hickey
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The defendant, Michael Hickey, appeals from the judgments of conviction1 of two counts of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 14-227a, as amended by Public Acts *5911999, No. 99-255, § l.2 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to dismiss because (1) as applied, § 14-227a (h), now (g), results in a violation of the ex post facto clause of the United States constitution and (2) the application of the statute constitutes a violation of his sixth amendment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State v. George B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. MattioliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Provident Bank v. LewittConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. KingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- State v. LambIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004