Legal Opinion

State v. Hickey

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 23, 2003No. AC 22847PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

The defendant, Michael Hickey, appeals from the judgments of conviction1 of two counts of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 14-227a, as amended by Public Acts *5911999, No. 99-255, § l.2 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to dismiss because (1) as applied, § 14-227a (h), now (g), results in a violation of the ex post facto clause of the United States constitution and (2) the application of the statute constitutes a violation of his sixth amendment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. State v. George B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. State v. MattioliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Provident Bank v. LewittConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  2. State v. KingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  3. State v. LambIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API