Legal Opinion

State v. Lamb

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 2009No. 34969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Chief Judge.

Frankie Gene Lamb appeals from his conviction for felony driving under the influence, asserting that the pursuit of the charge as a felony violates due process and the constitutional prohibition of ex post facto laws. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

In 2001 and again in 2003, Lamb was convicted of misdemeanor driving under the influence for offenses committed in Idaho. Under the law in effect at those times, a third DUI offense within five years could be charged as a felony. Idaho Code § 18-8005(5) (2003). Lamb was given warnings to that effect pursuant to I.C. §…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  2. Michael T. Hayes v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API