Legal Opinion
(PC) Perez v. Smith
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 29, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00840Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SANDRO S. PEREZ, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00840-DAD-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 13 v. ) TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES 14 A, SMITH, et al., ) (ECF No. 45) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff Sandro S. Perez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to compel, filed August 24, 2021. 20 I. 21 RELEVANT BACKGROUND 22 This action is proceeding against Defendants A. Smith,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.