Legal Opinion
United States v. James Maddox and Bradford G. Knowles
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 4, 1974No. 73-2611PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RONEY, Circuit Judge:
Defendants James Maddox and Bradford Knowles were found guilty of conspiring (18 U.S.C.A. § 371) to transport 10,000 stolen shirts in interstate commerce, knowing the shirts to be stolen (18 U.S.C.A. § 2314).
The most troublesome point in these appeals is the assertion by Maddox that the trial court improperly allowed a confession by co-defendant Knowles to be used against him. We have finally concluded, however, that whatever error may have occurred in this regard in the Government’s case in chief was cured when Knowles took the stand and admitted making the statement…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Enplanar, Inc. v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Jose Demetrio Arteaga-Limones and Mike Lozano CantuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Jack GravesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Paul Rice, Pedro Alvarez, John Leslie Wells, Jr., and Jerold MasslerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Robert Solomon, Charles SokolowCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.