Legal Opinion
Endara v. City of Culver City
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 20, 1956No. Civ. 21381PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
Plaintiffs brought an action for injunctive relief. The amended complaint set forth generally that the plaintiff Endara was the owner of certain property in the defendant city; that the two plaintiff corporations were lessees of the property in question; that the defendants threatened to arrest and annoy the plaintiff tenants; that the defendants directed to the plaintiffs a notice to the effect that the business carried on by the corporate plaintiffs at the property in question was in violation of Culver City Zoning Ordinance Number CS-147, and plaintiffs would be subject to the penalties of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Hairston v. Danville & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- White v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Paramount Rock Co. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Gagne v. Lewiston Crushed Stone Company, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Galyon v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- City of Los Altos v. SilveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.