Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Initiative Petitions Nos. 112, 114, 117, 118

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1931No. 23082, 23084, 23087, 23088Published

1DissentRiley, J.

The majority opinion of this -court, speaking through Mr. Justice Hefner, is based largely upon the proposition that the writ of injunction is denied because of adequacy of some other relief. The suggested relief is an action at law upon the official bond of the State Auditor in the event thi-s court should finally determine that the election of December 18, 1931, is invalid. That principle is error in its application, for the reason that the appropriated and now unexpended public fund is in the amount of $110,000. The official bond of the State Auditor is in the amount" of $50,000.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bank of North America v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
  2. In Re Initiative Petition No. 23, State Question No. 38Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. McConaughy v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Simpson v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Ex Parte WagnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API