Legal Opinion
Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S. A. v. Federal Maritime Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 7, 1967No. Nos. 18230, 18235PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Chief Judge:
This litigation is before us for the-third time.1 The first time we upheld the Federal Maritime Commission’s determination that Flota Mercante Grancolombiana (Flota) was a common carrier of bananas between Ecuador and the United States, and that, by entering into a forward booking contract for all of its banana space with another shipper, Flota had unjustly and unreasonably refused to supply space on its ships to *677Consolo.2 We also concluded that the Commission acted within its discretion in denying prejudgment interest to Consolo, in starting the reparations period at the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- New Mexico Ex Rel. E. J. McLean & Co. v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States Ex Rel. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, Blue Ridge Gas Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.