Legal Opinion

Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Steve Conrad

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 30, 1973No. 72-1672PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SULLIVAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from dismissal of plaintiff-appellant’s complaint seeking a *895declaratory judgment and a mandatory injunction whereby to require the Municipal Auditorium Board of Chattanooga, Tennessee, to lease a municipal thea-tre to appellant, there to exhibit the stage play HAIR. The theatre in question was under the control of such Auditorium Board. The case was heard at Chattanooga by the Honorable Frank W. Wilson, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Southern Division. He denied the relief asked by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. City of West Palm BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. City of Mobile, Alabama, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Southeastern Promotions, Inc. v. ConradDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1972
  4. Southeastern Promotions, Ltd., a New York Corporation v. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, an Oklahoma Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Koppinger v. City of FairmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Parker v. Local 413, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & HelpersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1980
  5. State of Tenn. v. HerringtonDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API