Legal Opinion
Yentis v. Mills
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 4, 1928No. Appeal, 105PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The court below refuged to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense and this appeal followed. We have repeatedly said that the record must clearly show plain error of law before we will sustain such an appeal (Federal Sales Co. v. Farrell, 264 Pa. 149, 153; Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Motor Tire Corporation, 291 Pa. 185), and this is not a case of that kind.
The order of the court below is affirmed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Federal Sales Co. v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Motor Tire Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sipp v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928