Legal Opinion

Yentis v. Mills

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1928No. Appeal, 105PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The court below refuged to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense and this appeal followed. We have repeatedly said that the record must clearly show plain error of law before we will sustain such an appeal (Federal Sales Co. v. Farrell, 264 Pa. 149, 153; Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Motor Tire Corporation, 291 Pa. 185), and this is not a case of that kind.

The order of the court below is affirmed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Federal Sales Co. v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Motor Tire Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sipp v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928