Legal Opinion

United States v. Godinez-Ortiz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 29, 2009No. 08-50337, 08-73791PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

Pedro Godinez-Ortiz, a defendant in a criminal case, appeals from the district court order of July 18, 2008, which returns him to the Federal Medical Facility in Butner, North Carolina, for a period not to exceed 45 days so that he could be evaluated for “dangerousness” and for a decision whether to file a dangerousness certification. Godinez-Ortiz asserts the district court lacked authority under both 18 U.S.C. § 4241 or 18 U.S.C. § 4246 to issue the order and that the order violated his due process rights under the Fifth Amendment. In the alternative,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Ruiz-GaxiolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Joaquin FoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. ChaudhryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Xiaoying Tang DowaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. HardyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API