Cassidy v. Sullivan
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of mandate. The facts are stated in the ouinion of the court.
1Per curiam
This is an application for a writ to compel the respondent, judge of the Superior Court, to have the issues of fact in a divorce case pending in said court tried by a jury. The clause of the Constitution mainly relied on reads as follows: “ The right of trial by jury shall be secured to all and remain inviolate.” (Const, art. i., § 7.) This implies the existence of the right. To secure is not to create or acquire, but “to make safe; to relieve from apprehensions of or exposure to danger; to guard, to protect.”—Webster. Under the provisions of other constitutions and statutes quite as broad as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Koppikus v. State Capitol Comm'rsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Grafton Partners L.P. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re the Guardianship of CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Freeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Union Oil Co. v. Reconstruction Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.